EFCC Sets Out Its Latest Position on the REACH Revision playlist_play

Today, EFCC submitted its position on the revision of the REACH Regulation to the European Commission. EFCC members were disappointed to learn, when the Commission presented the latest version of the planned revision measures in early April, that only minor changes were made compared to earlier drafts - despite the fact that these proposals would impose a significant burden on industry.

Read more

Downloaddownloading

EFCC's position on the revision of the REACH Regulation playlist_play

The European Federation for Construction Chemicals has published its responses to questions raised by the European Commission during the 53rd CARACAL meeting. This paper outlines EFCC's positions on key aspects of the REACH revision, including reducing administrative burdens, ensuring science-based and risk-based regulatory approaches, and improving enforcement and competitiveness. EFCC emphasizes the importance of preserving REACH’s high safety standards while ensuring the system remains efficient, predictable, and supportive of innovation and industry needs over the next two decades.

Read more

Downloaddownloading

Substitution Planning - European Commission workshop playlist_play

On 1 October 2024 EFCC participated at the European Commission’s second workshop on substitution planning in the context of REACH and other European chemicals legislation. We are pleased that EFCC could once again contribute to the exchange and look forward to future exchanges with policymakers on driving innovation and sustainable solutions in substitution planning, while safeguarding the competitiveness of the industry.

Read more

Position on the proposal for a Regulation on a common data platform on chemicals playlist_play

EFCC together with DUCC members expressed its support for the main objective of the OSOA approach presented under the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS) to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, coherence, and transparency of issuing safety assessments of chemicals across different pieces of EU legislation. EFCC also welcomes the legislative proposal regarding the establishment of a Common Data Platform on Chemicals (CDPC) and takes the opportunity to express its concerns regarding the scope and definitions, study notifications, as well as confidentiality and data management in response to the EC public consultation.

Read more

Downloaddownloading

Reiteration of the major negative impact on industry of the current CLP proposal regards minimum requirements for labelling playlist_play

As a follow-up of the industry cross sector group letter of 5 September 2023, today industry released a new joint letter to reiterate the major negative impact on industry of the current CLP proposal as regards minimum requirements for labelling. In the new letter industry invites legislators to keep an open mind going in the trilogue discussions regarding minimum font size requirements.

Read more

Downloaddownloading

EFCC joins cross-sector call for a rethink regarding CLP revision playlist_play

EFCC together with several industry federations calls for urgent dialogue and a rethink regarding CLP Revision. We focus on three key aspects that will have a major negative impact on industry and the environment: - he new 6-month timeline for label updates instead of the 18 months transition period provided in Adaptation to Technical Progress (ATP) to CLP for harmonised classifications to become mandatory - the tabled amendment within the European Parliament to prohibit environmental claims on mixtures classified as hazardous or carrying supplemental labelling - the proposed requirement of a minimum font size - we suggest to follow ECHA’s guidance of 1.2mm x-height as the minimum font size

Read more

Downloaddownloading

EFCC with other DUCC members released the last statement before the Council vote on the revision of the CLP playlist_play

Tomorrow the European Council votes on the compromise proposal on the revised EU legislation on hazard classification, labelling and packaging of chemicals (CLP). EFCC with other downstream user associations reiterated their concerns related to the revised proposal. We request more flexibility on the labelling requirements and reasonable transition periods for the application of the new criteria. You can read more details below.

Read more

Downloaddownloading

Cross industry request for a phased implementation of the Mixture Allocation Factor (MAF) playlist_play

EFCC members have expressed many times their concern about the planned introduction of the Mixture Allocation Factor (MAF). Now, in June 2023, we reiterate this concern together with all DUCC member associations and SMEunited. We voice again that even a proposed MAF of 5 will have substantial impacts on the entire chemicals value chain, with serious knock-on effects on EU competitiveness and sustainability-driven innovations and only with very limited contribution to the safer use of chemicals and in most cases no benefits to end-users and society. If the MAF is introduced regardless of the concerns, we ask for its phased, stepwise, implementation and starting with substances with the greatest potential to contribute to unintentional co-exposure. 

Read more

Downloaddownloading

EFCC reaction to the EC (WSP) report (April 2023) on the Essential Use Concept playlist_play

EFCC together with other ASMoR members presents its first reaction to the WSP report supporting the European Commission in developing an Essential Use Concept published in April 2023.  The study and more specifically Appendix C do not fully reflect established facts nor contributions made by ASMoR and its members during the consultation. We would like to highlight the following:  uses of most hazardous chemicals can be safe and, by discarding the possibility of ‘safe uses’ from the impact assessment, WSP is not giving the full picture of the consequences we object to extending the scope of the Essential Use Concept to industrial uses; contrary to what WSP states in the study, the EU’s chemicals strategy for sustainability (CSS) proposed it application to consumer uses and to a certain extent to professional uses ‘safe use’ has not been defined so far and we are willing to contribute to defining it.

Read more

Downloaddownloading